I read "Due Tomorrow, Do tomorrow"
I liked the way the essay was easily relate-able. The author used examples from his/her experiences as a student to back up his points and used his sources well.
What he/she could have done better was to better explain two of the kinds of procrastinators. The "Mind Game" and "Undefined Worker" could have been explained better. The difference between the two is not explained very well.
There are many sentences in the paper that make no sense how they are written.
There are a few paragraphs that should be moved around, or removed all together, as they are completely irrelevant.
It would be a good idea to state why you are quoting someone. What are their qualifications?
Over all, I thought the paper was decent at best. B-

No comments:
Post a Comment